I think that looks pretty good. I was going to comment that you should site the source in the text (with use of a footnote or other method) when you state facts from the time period. However considering that there is only one source used for your documentation one could assume that your information is coming from that source. Someone might comment that you should site the page, but I think you are fine.

You've clearly identified what you were trying to make, where it is from, what technique it uses and the time period. You've described your steps in making this, what tools you have used, what changes you have made and why. I'm looking forward to seeing the rest of the documentation with the weaving types and the finished work.

I think you have done a good job!